Showing category "Ideas" (Show all posts)

The Moon/Earth Paradox

Posted by Mick Cory on Wednesday, April 27, 2011, In : Ideas 
The earth gains approximately 2-3 tons of material from space each day.

Accordingly, the earth gains in gravity over time.

Yet, the moon moves away from the earth approximately 1/4 inch each year.

Why?

Continue reading ...
 

Further ideas about local shrinkage of galaxies

Posted by M.C.Malkemus on Monday, February 16, 2009, In : Ideas 
Fact: Black hole bodies absorb matter.
Fact: Each galaxie has a super massive black hole bodie at it's center.
Fact: Galaxies on occassion collide, and absorb each other, forming a larger galaxy.

Assumption: 
When two supermassive black hole bodies meet, it is reasonable to assume they absorb each other, creating a more massive super massive black hole body, with stronger gravity than both had before collision.
Assumpton:
When two similar sized galaxies combine, eventually they must return to the...
Continue reading ...
 

The Mystery of the Rapidly Expanding Universe Explained

Posted by M.C.Malkemus on Wednesday, February 11, 2009, In : Ideas 
Perhaps the most elegant part of this theory, is that it explains why galaxies move faster as they get farther away.

It's simple really. Ultra simple.

Assuming Big Collapse Process Theory is correct, imagine two galaxies, ours, and one 100 million light years away. Now a third, another 100 million light years away. Label them A, B, and C. A is 200 million light years away from C. (distances are arbitrary, for sake of illustration)

A is our milky way.
A appears not to move at all.
B appears to m...
Continue reading ...
 

Time/Space

Posted by M.C. Malkemus on Friday, February 6, 2009, In : Ideas 
Big collapse process theory says that time always exists within the visible universe, because things move and change relative to each other. Within the subatomic particle accretion mass however, nothing changes relative to anything. Therefore, because of lack of change, no time exists. Time is not an entity in itself, but a result of relative movement.

Big collapse process theory claims that time is an illusion caused by movement and change. Where there is no time, there is no movement. The ce...
Continue reading ...
 

According to Stephen Hawking

Posted by M.C. Malkemus on Friday, February 6, 2009, In : Ideas 
According to Stephen Hawking the microwave background predicts a hot dense state at the beginning of the universe.
Big collapse process theory states that a hot dense state always exists, within the subatomic particle accretion mass.

Professor Hawking readily admits that his calculations which support a singularity do not allow for the universe to begin, only what the universe will do once it is in motion. Big collapse process theory easily explains how the universe process creates the visible...
Continue reading ...
 

Question about E=mc^2 and the singularity...

Posted by M. C. Malkemus on Wednesday, February 4, 2009, In : Ideas 
Many say that Einsteins equations lead back to a moment when a singularity was all that was. This is in fact why big bang event theory took hold after Hubble found the Hubble constant. (Note that the equation did not predict a singularity before the Hubble constant was found...)

Yet, E=mc^2 means that the closer to the speed of light matter gets, the more energy it takes to move it faster and indeed, will require infinite energy to move it to the speed of light. If this is true, and most belie...
Continue reading ...
 

Subatomic particle accretion mass vs. black hole bodies

Posted by M. C. Malkemus on Monday, February 2, 2009, In : Ideas 
A black hole in modern cosmology is a singularity: no width, or almost infinitesimally small.
Taking the equations of Einstein, and working backwards, a singularity seems to exist at the moment of the big bang event.

In big collapse process theory, subatomic particle accretion mass is hot and gaseous in the extreme. Black Hole energy is dense, and cold in the extreme (except in the center, where gamma rays emit).

The interior of a black hole body is packed as tightly as possible with matter. I...
Continue reading ...
 

Subatomic Particle Accretion Mass

Posted by M. C. Malkemus on Monday, February 2, 2009, In : Ideas 
The question of what ultimately are the smallest particles is of little value in big collapse process theory.

At the outer limits of the visible universe, the anti-event horizon exists, and then subatomic particle accretion mass. Sure, it is possible that as volumes of subatomic particle accretion mass become hotter, smaller and more discrete particles exist. What we are concerned with in big collapse process theory is the transition between subatomic particle accretion mass and visible unive...
Continue reading ...
 

Hydrogen/Helium

Posted by M.C.Malkemus on Saturday, January 10, 2009, In : Ideas 
It occurred to me today, that part of the reason for shrinkage of galaxies is likely due to the fusion of hydrogen into helium.

Prior to this idea, I was thinking that galaxy shrinkage occurred because of an unknown shrinkage mechanism of atoms, which is unlikely according to physics.

The helium to hydrogen shrinkage idea is simpler, and what I'll go with for now...

"Hydrogen, as deuterium and tritium atoms, fuse to helium, here matter disappears and enormous quantities of energy are released...
Continue reading ...
 

Thoughts

Posted by M.C.Malkemus on Friday, January 9, 2009, In : Ideas 
This is the area where I log the process of putting this theory together.

Continue reading ...
 
 

Independent Researcher


Mick Malkemus Graduate SDSU 2006, Multimedia................ Graduate WaldenU 2009, I/O Psych................ Why independent? At times throughout history, scientific communities have been blinded by particular theories and tended to support each other in their blindness until such time as a paradigm shift changed their culture. Remaining independent, but still accessible to scrutiny via the Internet, is better in my opinion, and can lead to scientific discovery faster................ Imagine Einstein hard at work with the leading scientists of his day, trying to get support for his theory of relativity. They would have shot him down at every turn, and he just might have given up the idea entirely as having been impossible................ Leaders emerge in the public scientific community, and decide in what ways science will be researched, and what is acceptible, and what is not. It doesn't mean that they are correct about everything. It simply means that they have power and influence................ Skype: mick.malkemus

Recent Posts