Showing category "Prediction" (Show all posts)

Simplest solution to this theory

Posted by M.C.Malkemus on Saturday, February 21, 2009, In : Prediction 
If atoms are shrinking over time (not such a leap of imagination, as atoms are mostly empty space), then all redshift is easily explained by the increasing distance between galaxies, instead of 'expanding space'. Again, according to big collapse theory, space does not expand, it is only an illusion created by galaxy shrinkage relative to each other.

Prediction: If we can observe other lunar objects around other planets, such as the two moons of Mars, moving away from Mars at the same rate/size...
Continue reading ...
 

The Main Point

Posted by M.C.Malkemus on Friday, February 6, 2009, In : Prediction 
The main point of this entire website, is that just because it appears that galaxies are moving away from us, doesn't mean that they are.

The very real possibility that everything remains relatively where it was when the subatomic particle accretion mass collapsed in our local physical universe exists because of culmulative shrinkage of galaxies over time, producing the illusion that space between them is expanding. It is the same space as before, just less of it in galaxies and more of it be...
Continue reading ...
 

Metal-poor stars

Posted by M.C.Malkemus on Thursday, January 15, 2009, In : Prediction 
Prediction: There should be more metal poor stars with higher lithium content closer to the anti-event horizon than there are near the center of the visible universe.

Why?: They have had less time to evolve into heavy metal stars. Areas of the visible universe that cooled sooner will have more heavy metal stars with less lithium content.

Continue reading ...
 
 

Independent Researcher


Mick Malkemus Graduate SDSU 2006, Multimedia................ Graduate WaldenU 2009, I/O Psych................ Why independent? At times throughout history, scientific communities have been blinded by particular theories and tended to support each other in their blindness until such time as a paradigm shift changed their culture. Remaining independent, but still accessible to scrutiny via the Internet, is better in my opinion, and can lead to scientific discovery faster................ Imagine Einstein hard at work with the leading scientists of his day, trying to get support for his theory of relativity. They would have shot him down at every turn, and he just might have given up the idea entirely as having been impossible................ Leaders emerge in the public scientific community, and decide in what ways science will be researched, and what is acceptible, and what is not. It doesn't mean that they are correct about everything. It simply means that they have power and influence................ Skype: mick.malkemus

Recent Posts