The Big Collapse

Many say that Einsteins equations lead back to a moment when a singularity was all that was. This is in fact why big bang event theory took hold after Hubble found the Hubble constant. (Note that the equation did not predict a singularity before the Hubble constant was found...)

Yet, E=mc^2 means that the closer to the speed of light matter gets, the more energy it takes to move it faster and indeed, will require infinite energy to move it to the speed of light. If this is true, and most believe it is, how could a singularity expand all matter? Would not the reverse be true? Would not the singularity resist expansion, because so much energy would be required to expand it, that it would be impossible?

Assume we are at the epoch of the singularity:
E= all the matter in the universe, and zero velocity (0), squared.
Let's calculate that out:
E=1((0)^2)=0
E=10^10((0)^2)=0
E=10^10^10^10^10^10^10^10^10^10^10^10^10^10^10^10^10^10^10^10^10^10^10((0)^2)=0
etc....

Hmmm.... so why exactly did the singularity expand? According to the equation, there was nothing to expand it. No force whatsoever.

Remember, at the point of singularity, there is no time, no space, and no movement whatsoever. Big bang event theory says space expanded from the singularity. Clearly we can see, this simply isn't possible, even according to the equation that is supposed to point toward the big bang event itself.

And for those that claim there was no matter in the singularity, you will certainly agree that whatever became matter (energy?) was present within the singularity, and in equal amount to the matter/space/time continuum that is present today.

A black hole in modern cosmology is a singularity: no width, or almost infinitesimally small.
Taking the equations of Einstein, and working backwards, a singularity seems to exist at the moment of the big bang event.

In big collapse process theory, subatomic particle accretion mass is hot and gaseous in the extreme. Black Hole energy is dense, and cold in the extreme (except in the center, where gamma rays emit).

The interior of a black hole body is packed as tightly as possible with matter. It has a greater circumference the more matter accumulates in it. The temperature at the center is most likely absolute zero... no movement whatsoever, with matter pressing against matter as tightly as is physical possible to achieve.

In many respects, a black hole energy is the exact opposite of SPAM energy.

The question of what ultimately are the smallest particles is of little value in big collapse process theory.

At the outer limits of the visible universe, the anti-event horizon exists, and then subatomic particle accretion mass. Sure, it is possible that as volumes of subatomic particle accretion mass become hotter, smaller and more discrete particles exist. What we are concerned with in big collapse process theory is the transition between subatomic particle accretion mass and visible universe. The smallest of the small will rarely exist inside the visible universe, except in high particle physics experiments, and random events in space. Deep inside the subatomic particle accretion mass are conditions that will always be completely inaccessible to us.

Prediction: There should be more metal poor stars with higher lithium content closer to the anti-event horizon than there are near the center of the visible universe.

Why?: They have had less time to evolve into heavy metal stars. Areas of the visible universe that cooled sooner will have more heavy metal stars with less lithium content.

It is entirely possible that the anti-event horizon (the periphery of the visible universe where matter forms or is annihilated, and we cannot see beyond) is beyond our ability to verify through observation: the visible universe within the subatomic particle accretion mass may be much larger than the visible universe that we can actually see, extending beyond lights' ability to travel to earth and thus reveal it, according the current age of our local visible universe.

For example, if the diameter of the physical universe is 100 billion years in diameter, and our local area of the visible universe is only 15 billion years in diameter, the light from the outer periphery of the physical universe might not reach earth from any time between tomorrow, if we are located near an outer wall of this construct, to 35 billion years, if we are near the center of the construct.

If however, the visible universe equals the physical universe, then no such problems of observing the anti-event horizon will be encountered. It is likely that visible universe=physical universe as the cosmic background radiation-anti-event horizon can be ascertained using instrumentation. 

If big collapse process theory is correct:

Prediction 1) Approximately half the faint points of light at the outer edge of our universe should appear brighter over time, as galaxies coalesce within a cooling area. (These areas should be observed over the cooler areas of the CBR map)
 
Prediction 2) Approximately half the faint points of light at the outer edge of our universe should appear dimmer over time, as galaxies dissipate within a heating area.     (These areas should be observed over the hotter areas of the CBR map)
 

It occurred to me today, that part of the reason for shrinkage of galaxies is likely due to the fusion of hydrogen into helium.

Prior to this idea, I was thinking that galaxy shrinkage occurred because of an unknown shrinkage mechanism of atoms, which is unlikely according to physics.

The helium to hydrogen shrinkage idea is simpler, and what I'll go with for now...

"Hydrogen, as deuterium and tritium atoms, fuse to helium, here matter disappears and enormous quantities of energy are released (E=mc²)."

Also, black hole consumption of matter should account for galaxy shrinkage. It is not yet determined what amount of galaxy shrinkage is accounted for by each phenomenon.

Calculations according to data accumulated will have to be created.

This is the area where I log the process of putting this theory together.