Showing Tag: "experiment" (Show all posts)

Subatomic Particle Accretion Mass

Posted by M. C. Malkemus on Monday, February 2, 2009, In : Ideas 
The question of what ultimately are the smallest particles is of little value in big collapse process theory.

At the outer limits of the visible universe, the anti-event horizon exists, and then subatomic particle accretion mass. Sure, it is possible that as volumes of subatomic particle accretion mass become hotter, smaller and more discrete particles exist. What we are concerned with in big collapse process theory is the transition between subatomic particle accretion mass and visible unive...
Continue reading ...
 

Observational experiment proposed for confirmation of theory

Posted by M.C.Malkemus on Wednesday, January 14, 2009, In : Experiment 
If big collapse process theory is correct:

Prediction 1) Approximately half the faint points of light at the outer edge of our universe should appear brighter over time, as galaxies coalesce within a cooling area. (These areas should be observed over the cooler areas of the CBR map)
 
Prediction 2) Approximately half the faint points of light at the outer edge of our universe should appear dimmer over time, as galaxies dissipate within a heating area.     (These areas should be observed over the...
Continue reading ...
 
 

Independent Researcher


Mick Malkemus Graduate SDSU 2006, Multimedia................ Graduate WaldenU 2009, I/O Psych................ Why independent? At times throughout history, scientific communities have been blinded by particular theories and tended to support each other in their blindness until such time as a paradigm shift changed their culture. Remaining independent, but still accessible to scrutiny via the Internet, is better in my opinion, and can lead to scientific discovery faster................ Imagine Einstein hard at work with the leading scientists of his day, trying to get support for his theory of relativity. They would have shot him down at every turn, and he just might have given up the idea entirely as having been impossible................ Leaders emerge in the public scientific community, and decide in what ways science will be researched, and what is acceptible, and what is not. It doesn't mean that they are correct about everything. It simply means that they have power and influence................ Skype: mick.malkemus

Recent Posts