Showing Tag: "infinite" (Show all posts)

Question about E=mc^2 and the singularity...

Posted by M. C. Malkemus on Wednesday, February 4, 2009, In : Ideas 
Many say that Einsteins equations lead back to a moment when a singularity was all that was. This is in fact why big bang event theory took hold after Hubble found the Hubble constant. (Note that the equation did not predict a singularity before the Hubble constant was found...)

Yet, E=mc^2 means that the closer to the speed of light matter gets, the more energy it takes to move it faster and indeed, will require infinite energy to move it to the speed of light. If this is true, and most belie...
Continue reading ...
 

Subatomic particle accretion mass vs. black hole bodies

Posted by M. C. Malkemus on Monday, February 2, 2009, In : Ideas 
A black hole in modern cosmology is a singularity: no width, or almost infinitesimally small.
Taking the equations of Einstein, and working backwards, a singularity seems to exist at the moment of the big bang event.

In big collapse process theory, subatomic particle accretion mass is hot and gaseous in the extreme. Black Hole energy is dense, and cold in the extreme (except in the center, where gamma rays emit).

The interior of a black hole body is packed as tightly as possible with matter. I...
Continue reading ...
 
 

Independent Researcher


Mick Malkemus Graduate SDSU 2006, Multimedia................ Graduate WaldenU 2009, I/O Psych................ Why independent? At times throughout history, scientific communities have been blinded by particular theories and tended to support each other in their blindness until such time as a paradigm shift changed their culture. Remaining independent, but still accessible to scrutiny via the Internet, is better in my opinion, and can lead to scientific discovery faster................ Imagine Einstein hard at work with the leading scientists of his day, trying to get support for his theory of relativity. They would have shot him down at every turn, and he just might have given up the idea entirely as having been impossible................ Leaders emerge in the public scientific community, and decide in what ways science will be researched, and what is acceptible, and what is not. It doesn't mean that they are correct about everything. It simply means that they have power and influence................ Skype: mick.malkemus

Recent Posts