Dark matter: a mysterious invisible substance, that is only revealed by it's purported influence on celestial bodies as indicated by gravitational forces. (Anyone remember phlogiston?) In fact, prior to the Hubble constant, there wasn't even a conception of 'dark matter', it simply wasn't needed. Dark matter may indeed be real, but real or not, the BB theory needs it, the BC theory does not, although it could exist, even withing the BC theory.
This is from a growing group of individuals that are no longer satisfied with big bang theory.
"You may think I'm a dreamer.... but I'm not the only one." John Lennon
Problems with Big Bang Theory
The link above is a popular website listing the main problems with BB theory.
This page will attempt to address these 10 points in terms of BC theory, to see if they can be rectified.
The items below are popular problems, but I see a few additional ones, which I'll post at a later time...
This page will attempt to address these 10 points in terms of BC theory, to see if they can be rectified.
The items below are popular problems, but I see a few additional ones, which I'll post at a later time...
- Static universe models fit the data better than expanding universe models.
- The idea of a static universe or "Einstein's universe" is one which demands that space is not expanding nor contracting but rather is dynamically stable.
- Albert Einstein once proposed such a model as his preferred cosmology by adding a cosmological constant to his equations of general relativity to counteract the dynamical effects of gravity which in a universe of matter would cause the universe to collapse. This motivation evaporated after the discovery by Edwin Hubble that the universe is not static, but expanding; in particular, Hubble discovered a relationship between redshift and distance, which forms the basis for the modern expansion paradigm.This led Einstein to declare this cosmological model, and especiallythe introduction of the cosmological constant, his "biggest blunder"
- According to BC theory, Einstein was correct.
- The idea of a static universe or "Einstein's universe" is one which demands that space is not expanding nor contracting but rather is dynamically stable.
- The microwave"background" makes more sense as the limiting temperature of spaceheated by starlight than as the remnant of a fireball.
- Yes it does.
- Although it also makes sense as a buffer zone between SPAM interacting with VU of creation and destruction. Hotter areas of SPAM/VU interaction destroying VU, and cooler parts creating VU.
- The variation in background radiation is only 0.00001°K, indicating that the balance between SPAM turning into VU or VU turning into SPAM is respondent to initial conditions as found in chaos theory.
- Yes it does.
- Element abundance predictions using the big bang require too many adjustable parameters to make them work.
- The BC explains the abundance of hydrogen, helium, and lithium at the leading edge of the SPAM/VU interaction as result of chaotic fluctions of relative heat and cold that allow for formation of these elements, the formation being a statististical parameter, not an absolute.
- The universe has too muchlarge scale structure (interspersed "walls" and voids) to form in atime as short as 10-20 billion years.
- The current explanation which was added to account for this discrepency was 'dark matter'. The process of SPAM/VU interaction requires no such explanations, as there is not a definite age of the PU.
- Structures within the PU can be old or young, dependent upon chaotic conditions: some galaxies may be much older than the maximum estimated age of the universe.
- For instance, some galaxies that from near the leading edge of the SPAM/VU interaction might be turned back into elementary particles in a few billion years after formation.
- The current explanation which was added to account for this discrepency was 'dark matter'. The process of SPAM/VU interaction requires no such explanations, as there is not a definite age of the PU.
- The average luminosity ofquasars must decrease with time in just the right way so that theirmean apparent brightness is the same at all redshifts, which isexceedingly unlikely.
- To be explored.
- The ages of globular clusters appear older than the universe.
- BC explains this. Globular clusters are mature galaxies that originally formed sooner in the SPAM/VU interaction than younger galaxies.
- To be explored further.
- The local streaming motions of galaxies are too high for a finite universe that is supposed to be everywhere uniform.
- To be explored.
- Invisible dark matter of an unknown but non-baryonic nature must be the dominant ingredient of the entire universe.
- To be explored.
- The most distant galaxiesin the Hubble Deep Field show insufficient evidence of evolution, withsome of them apparently having higher redshifts (z = 6-7) than thefaintest quasars.
- BC theory excels in this regard. The youngest galaxies would naturally be closest to the SPAM/VU interaction. The oldest galaxies would be towards the center of the CBR map.
- To be explored futher.
- BC theory excels in this regard. The youngest galaxies would naturally be closest to the SPAM/VU interaction. The oldest galaxies would be towards the center of the CBR map.
- If the open universe wesee today is extrapolated back near the beginning, the ratio of theactual density of matter in the universe to the critical density mustdiffer from unity by just a part in 1059. Any larger deviation would result in a universe already collapsed on itself or already dissipated.
- The falloff of the power spectrum at small scales can be used to determine the temperature of the intergalactic medium. It is typically inferred to be 20,000°K, but there is no evidence of evolution with redshift. Yet in the Big Bang, that temperature ought to adiabatically decrease as space expands everywhere. This is another indicator that the universe is not really expanding.] [[58]]
- The fundamental question of why it is that at early cosmological times, bound aggregates of order 100,000 stars (globular clusters) were able to form remains unsolved in the Big Bang. It is no mystery in infinite universe models. [[66]]
- Blue galaxy counts show an excess of faint blue galaxies by a factor of 10 at magnitude 28. This implies that the volume of space is larger than in the Big Bang, where it should get smaller as one looks back in time. [[67]]
